Pricing Strategies : Everyday Low Pricing, Other Pricing Strategies

Everyday Low Pricing

Everyday low price is a pricing strategy offering consumers a low price without having to wait for sale price events or comparison shopping.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Translate the meaning of the EDLP (everyday low price) pricing strategy

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Key Points

  • Every day low pricing saves retail stores the effort and expense needed to mark down prices in the store during sale events, as well as to market these events.
  • One 1994 study of an 86-store supermarket grocery chain in the United States concluded that a 10% EDLP price decrease in a category increased sales volume by 3%, while a 10% Hi-Low price increase led to a 3% sales decrease.
  • Trader Joe’s is an example of successful EDLP. It is unique because it does not market itself like other grocery stores do, nor are customers required to obtain membership to enjoy its low prices – at Trader Joe’s, its everyday low prices are available to everyone.

Key Terms

  • supermarket: a large self-service store that sells groceries and, usually, medications, household goods and/or clothing
  • Hi-low price: High-low pricing (or hi-low pricing) is a type of pricing strategy adopted by companies, usually small- and medium-sized retail firms, where a firm charges a high price for an item and later sells it to customers by giving discounts or through clearance sales.

Everyday low price (EDLP) is a pricing strategy promising consumers a low price without the need to wait for sale price events or comparison shopping.

EDLP saves retail stores the effort and expense needed to mark down prices in the store during sale events, as well as to market these events. EDLP is believed to generate shopper loyalty. It was noted in 1994 that the Wal-Mart retail chain in America, which follows an EDLP strategy, would buy “feature advertisements” in newspapers on a monthly basis, while its competitors would advertise 52 weeks per year.

Procter & Gamble, Wal-Mart, Food Lion, Gordmans, and Winn-Dixie are firms that have implemented or championed EDLP. One 1992 study stated that 26% of American supermarket retailers pursued some form of EDLP, meaning the other 74% were Hi-Lo promotion-oriented operators.

One 1994 study of an 86-store supermarket grocery chain in the United States concluded that a 10% EDLP price decrease in a category increased sales volume by 3%, while a 10% Hi-Low price increase led to a 3% sales decrease; but that because consumer demand at the supermarket did not respond much to changes in everyday price, an EDLP policy reduced profits by 18%, while Hi-Lo pricing increased profits by 15%.

An example of a successful brand (other than the infamous Wal-Mart) that uses the EDLP strategy is Trader Joe’s. Trader Joe’s is a private-brand label that conducts a Niche marketing strategy describing itself as the “neighborhood store. ” The firm has been growing at a steady pace, offering a wide variety of organic and natural food items that are hard to find, enabling the business to enjoy a distinctive competitive advantage.

image

Trader Joe’s: Trader Joe’s is unique because it doesn’t require membership for its customers to enjoy its low prices.

Apart from the many strengths of Trader Joe’s, the most prominent is their commitment to quality and lower prices. The company has worked hard to manage this economic image of value for its products that competitors, even giant retail stores, are unable to meet. Trader Joe’s is not an ordinary store. It is unique because it does not market itself like other grocery stores do nor does it require its customers to take out a membership to enjoy its low prices.

At Trader Joe’s, its everyday low prices are available to everyone. The firm states that “every penny we save is every penny our customer saves” (Trader Joe’s 2010).

High/Low Pricing

High-low pricing is a strategy where most goods offered are priced higher than competitors, but lower prices are offered on other key items.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Recognize the mechanism of High/Low pricing strategies

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Key Points

  • The lower promotional prices are designed to bring customers to the organization where the customer is offered the promotional product as well as the regular higher priced products.
  • The basic type of customers for the firms adopting high-low price do not have a clear idea about what a product’s price would typically be or have a strong belief that “discount sales = low price”.
  • The way competition prevails in the shoe and fashion industry is through high-low price strategies.

Key Terms

  • everyday low price: Everyday low price (“EDLP”) is a pricing strategy promising consumers a low price without the need to wait for sale price events or comparison shop.
  • belief: mental acceptance of a claim as truth regardless of supporting or contrary empirical evidence

High-low pricing is a method of pricing for an organization where the goods or services offered by the organization are regularly priced higher than competitors. However, through promotions, advertisements, and or coupons, lower prices are offered on other key items consumers would want to purchase. The lower promotional prices are designed to bring customers to the organization where the customer is offered the promotional product as well as the regular higher priced products.

High-low pricing is a type of pricing strategy adopted by companies, usually small and medium sized retail firms. The basic type of customers for the firms adopting high-low price will not have a clear idea about what a product’s price would typically be or have a strong belief that “discount sales = low price. ” Customers for firms adopting this type of strategy also have strong preference in purchasing the products sold in this type or by this certain firm. They are loyal to a specific brand.

A Nike swoosh on a shoe.

High-Low Pricing Strategies: Many big firms are using high-low pricing strategies, especially in the shoe industry (ex: Reebok, Nike, and Adidas).

There are many big firms using this type of pricing strategy (ex: Reebok, Nike, Adidas). The way competition prevails in the shoe industry is through high-low price. Also high-low pricing is extensively used in the fashion industry by companies (ex: Macy’s and Nordstrom) This pricing strategy is not only in the shoe and fashion industry but also in many other industries. However, in these industries one or two firms will not provide discounts and works on fixed rate of earnings. Those firms will follow everyday low price strategy in order to compete in the market.

Other Pricing Strategies

One pricing strategy does not fit all, thus adapting various pricing strategies to new scenarios is necessary for a firm to stay viable.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Describe various pricing strategies

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Key Points

  • Cost-plus pricing is the simplest pricing method. The firm calculates the cost of producing the product and adds on a percentage ( profit ) to that price to give the selling price.
  • Dynamic pricing allows online companies to adjust the prices of identical goods to correspond to a customer’s willingness to pay. The airline industry is often cited as a success story. Most of the passengers on any given airplane have paid different ticket prices for the same flight.
  • Non-price competition means that organizations use strategies other than price to attract customers. Advertising,credit, delivery, displays, private brands, and convenience are all examples of tools used in non-price competition.

Key Terms

  • marketing mix: A business tool used in marketing products; often crucial when determining a product or brand’s unique selling point. Often synonymous with the four Ps: price, product, promotion, and place.
  • economies of scale: The cost advantages that an enterprise obtains due to expansion. As the scale of output is increased, factors such as facility size and usage levels of inputs cause the producer’s average cost per unit to fall.

Pricing strategies for products or services encompass three main ways to improve profits. The business owner can cut costs, sell more, or find more profit with a better pricing strategy. When costs are already at their lowest and sales are hard to find, adopting a better pricing strategy is a key option to stay viable. There are many different pricing strategies that can be utilized for different selling scenarios:

Cost-Plus Pricing

Cost-plus pricing is the simplest pricing method. The firm calculates the cost of producing the product and adds on a percentage (profit) to that price to give the selling price. This method although simple has two flaws: it takes no account of demand and there is no way of determining if potential customers will purchase the product at the calculated price.

Limit Pricing

A limit price is the price set by a monopolist to discourage economic entry into a market, and is illegal in many countries. The limit price is the price that the entrant would face upon entering as long as the incumbent firm did not decrease output. The limit price is often lower than the average cost of production or just low enough to make entering not profitable. The quantity produced by the incumbent firm to act as a deterrent to entry is usually larger than would be optimal for a monopolist, but might still produce higher economic profits than would be earned under perfect competition.

Dynamic Pricing

A flexible pricing mechanism made possible by advances in information technology, and employed mostly by Internet based companies. By responding to market fluctuations or large amounts of data gathered from customers – ranging from where they live to what they buy to how much they have spent on past purchases – dynamic pricing allows online companies to adjust the prices of identical goods to correspond to a customer’s willingness to pay. The airline industry is often cited as a success story. In fact, it employs the technique so artfully that most of the passengers on any given airplane have paid different ticket prices for the same flight.

An Air Canada airplane.

Dynamic Pricing: Dynamic pricing allows online companies to adjust the prices of identical goods to correspond to a customer’s willingness to pay.

Non-Price Competition

Non-price competition means that organizations use strategies other than price to attract customers. Advertising, credit, delivery, displays, private brands, and convenience are all examples of tools used in non-price competition. Business people prefer to use non-price competition rather than price competition, because it is more difficult to match non-price characteristics.

Pricing Above Competitors

Pricing above competitors can be rewarding to organizations, provided that the objectives of the policy are clearly understood and that the marketing mix is used to develop a strategy to enable management to implement the policy successfully. Pricing above competition generally requires a clear advantage on some non-price element of the marketing mix. In some cases, it is possible due to a high price-quality association on the part of potential buyers. Such an assumption is increasingly dangerous in today’s information-rich environment. Consumer Reports and other similar publications make objective product comparisons much simpler for the consumer. There are also hundreds of dot.com companies that provide objective price comparisons. The key is to prove to customers that your product justifies a premium price.

Pricing Below Competitors

While some firms are positioned to price above competition, others wish to carve out a market niche by pricing below competitors. The goal of such a policy is to realize a large sales volume through a lower price and profit margins. By controlling costs and reducing services, these firms are able to earn an acceptable profit, even though profit per unit is usually less. Such a strategy can be effective if a significant segment of the market is price-sensitive and/or the organization’s cost structure is lower than competitors. Costs can be reduced by increased efficiency, economies of scale, or by reducing or eliminating such things as credit, delivery, and advertising. For example, if a firm could replace its field sales force with telemarketing or online access, this function might be performed at lower cost. Such reductions often involve some loss in effectiveness, so the trade off must be considered carefully.